Sanctions
Conflicting Economic Claims Between Cuba and the United States
The United States possesses a legitimate, though methodologically inflated, claim arising from the 1959-1960 Cuban nationalizations. Cuba possesses a substantially larger, legally cognizable counter-claim arising from sixty-five years of comprehensive economic coercion. On a net basis, the equitable balance tilts substantially in Cuba’s favor. The 2026 oil blockade crosses the threshold of collective punishment and eliminates any remaining proportionality defense that Washington could invoke.
Read more →GAESA: State Within a State, or Revolutionary Lifeline?
A documented analysis of Cuba’s military conglomerate GAESA — separating corroborated evidence from disputed claims, and tracing the connections between leaked financial records, U.S. sanctions strategy, and the life imprisonment of a former economy minister.
Read more →Cuba at a Crossroads: The May 21, 2026 Escalation
On May 21, 2026, four distinct but converging stories sharpened the U.S.–Cuba confrontation: an unsealed indictment of former president Raúl Castro, condemnations from Moscow and Beijing, an 8–1 Supreme Court ruling expanding Helms-Burton liability against major cruise lines, and a defiant mobilization by the Cuban government. Together they suggest a coordinated pressure campaign with parallels to the Trump administration’s earlier action against Venezuela.
Read more →